LovePorsche.com




What’s the maximum mileage I should buy a used 200x Porsche Boxster with?

porsche


I am planning on buying a used Porsche Boxster 2000 – 2002. What should the maximum mileage on the car be, and how many miles do the Boxsters usually run well for?







12 Responses to 'What’s the maximum mileage I should buy a used 200x Porsche Boxster with?'

  1. Paul S - November 1st, 2006 at 4:20 pm

    Traditionally, buying a used Porsche has not been about the milage on the car, but the car’s condition. The introduction of the Boxster brought about alot of changes in how Porsche builds cars, and as a generalization they are not as over-engineered as some previous generations of Porsches have been… but that said, my experience with Boxsters shows that you are still looking at many of the same concepts.

    A car with 100k miles that has been well cared for and maintained will be a much better buy than a car with 40k miles that has a spotty record of oil changes and a history of over-revving. There is nothing so far to indicate that the basic 986/996 engine block is going to be less durable than those of earlier Porsches, so milage shouldn’t be a key decider unless all other aspects of the cars are identical.

    Find a car you like, and make sure you have a pre-purchase inspection by a knowledgable Porsche mechanic. If the engine’s compression and leakdown look good, and all expected maintainance is documented, I would not worry about the milage (and actually, since these cars are actually designed to be driven and running them keeps parts lubricated, cars with exceptionally low milage are often ones that are most likely to have problems).

    All of that said, you should likely expect to see around 6-10k miles/year on these cars. Anything more would be considered high milage.

  2. Kyle M - November 1st, 2006 at 7:45 pm

    as usual, paul S is spot on.

    Its about condition and history, not mileage. A car with 30,000 miles of track use and poor maitenance will be far worse than a car with 100k and great maitenance.

    And i suggest upgrading to the S. Theyre a bit more expensive, but WELL worth it. Huge upgrade for not a whole lot of cash. More power, better handing, more agressive look, better brakes, etc etc.

    and if you maintain a porsche well, theyre damned near indestructable. I know a guy with an old 911 with 190k miles on it that still tracks the damned thing regularly, on all original parts. The boxster should last you 100+k easily, with good maitenance.

  3. AmKQjL - June 22nd, 2010 at 9:05 am

    ZjmMrH

  4. XaiHPRD - June 22nd, 2010 at 10:14 am

    yfVgPj

  5. gezginler indir - October 10th, 2010 at 7:00 pm

    The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

  6. indir - October 10th, 2010 at 9:57 pm

    Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

  7. Garry Prevette - October 12th, 2010 at 2:27 am

    If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.

  8. learn how to - October 15th, 2010 at 3:12 am

    The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

  9. learn how to tie a tie - October 18th, 2010 at 11:36 pm

    Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.

  10. how to how to build a house - October 20th, 2010 at 12:26 am

    The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  11. Otelia Emdee - October 21st, 2010 at 4:51 am

    Sorry for the huge review, but I’m really loving the new Zune, and hope this, as well as the excellent reviews some other people have written, will help you decide if it’s the right choice for you.

  12. film izle - November 5th, 2010 at 4:40 am

    Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.


Leave a Reply