LovePorsche.com




997 Porsche RSR



Badass 997 Porsche RSR







30 Responses to '997 Porsche RSR'

  1. NoxNoctisUmbra - January 9th, 2007 at 8:27 am

    oh, because mostly its RRs not MRs.. well for production wise i mean too ;)

  2. spartanic - January 11th, 2007 at 9:25 pm

    Thanks. I’m sure everyone was wondering what those two pipes sticking out the back of the RSR was. Who knew it was exhaust pipes! lol.

  3. spartanic - January 14th, 2007 at 8:22 pm

    Um, it is mid engine.

  4. DCXXX - January 15th, 2007 at 1:12 am

    Amazing car! Must nice to be able to afford one. Thanks for the video.

  5. illnacord - January 18th, 2007 at 8:12 am

    That’s an exhaust. Tuning is totally on point.

  6. NoxNoctisUmbra - January 19th, 2007 at 10:06 am

    Why cant they make this RSR and move engine closer to middle? Sure Porsche is knows for RR eninges, but it would be sweet to see this model with mid engine.. :)

  7. s1xsp33d - January 20th, 2007 at 12:22 pm

    Hes lucky just to sit in the RSR.

  8. derbilover - January 21st, 2007 at 7:13 pm

    absolutly one of the coolest race cars ever :D Ferrari does’t belong on the track, especially not 24h. Thtas the home of rsr :P

  9. gcataldo56 - January 25th, 2007 at 4:33 am

    its compettitive u gotta be stupid

  10. Nigh7Stalk3r - January 26th, 2007 at 8:39 pm

    Just to add this video was recorded at Brands Hatch.

  11. Nigh7Stalk3r - January 28th, 2007 at 6:52 pm

    Correct it is Tech 9 Motorsport bassed in Leeds drivers were Sean Edwards and Leo Machitski(originaly uploaded this video to youtube but this person seems to have re-uploaded it for no reason).

  12. klenkart - January 31st, 2007 at 7:05 am

    12hrs sebring porsche took 1st and 2nd in gt2 beating the ferrari and in lmp1 took first as well. Not competitive, learn some history.

  13. menash23 - February 3rd, 2007 at 6:44 pm

    in the sebring race 2 first places in GT2 are RSR, and the 430 are behind them
    that says it all.

  14. sigsauer12 - February 5th, 2007 at 12:22 am

    You need to reply to the right person. Read my statement again. You need to reply to- raceteamleader if you want him to see what yuo write.

  15. jelzin1985 - February 8th, 2007 at 9:40 am

    not competitve, u crazy?? best cars in the world!!!

  16. Ockenfels - February 9th, 2007 at 6:30 pm

    u r right …. sad but true …. porsche has to work with 6 zyl boxer engine … they cant get more power out of it without turbo or more ccm …

  17. raceteamleader - February 11th, 2007 at 6:57 pm

    It´s a solid fact that the current 997 GT3 RSR model needs speed and a different weight distribution to be able to compete with the Ferrari 430 GT racers, especially their new ´08 model. Just take a look at the possible and confirmed entries for the FIA GT series next year..Almost everyone in the GT2 are switching to 430´s..Sad but true..I´d really like to see Porsche solve their problems, but development of the Spyders seems to have been taken up all their time.

  18. sigsauer12 - February 12th, 2007 at 2:55 pm

    Just curious, what do you mean not competitive! Porsche holds more race wins than any other car manufacturer. Well over 28,000

  19. raceteamleader - February 14th, 2007 at 2:54 am

    Beautiful car, but not competitive at all..

  20. zaine68 - February 14th, 2007 at 7:18 pm

    Hate to burst your bubble, but that fine bit of kit is based in England. You can tell A) by the accients and B) the fact that they mention the wonderful English sunshine right at the beginning before off loading the car!!

  21. forbesdamnit21 - February 16th, 2007 at 10:37 pm

    it is in the states there are only 9 registered one is my 2003 the others are located in california new york and georgia

  22. SCCARacer42 - February 18th, 2007 at 7:04 pm

    I’m in love with this car, bring it over to the states, I want to see it run :)

  23. gezginler indir - October 10th, 2010 at 9:57 pm

    Sorry for the huge review, but I’m really loving the new Zune, and hope this, as well as the excellent reviews some other people have written, will help you decide if it’s the right choice for you.

  24. Xavier Cratch - October 12th, 2010 at 2:28 am

    Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.

  25. how to do - October 15th, 2010 at 3:13 am

    Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  26. know how to tie a tie - October 18th, 2010 at 11:36 pm

    Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.

  27. how to how to build a house - October 20th, 2010 at 12:27 am

    I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  28. how to write a resume - October 20th, 2010 at 3:23 am

    The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  29. Dominica Afan - October 21st, 2010 at 9:19 am

    I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  30. indirmeden film izle - November 5th, 2010 at 4:34 am

    If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.


Leave a Reply