LovePorsche.com




Donald is looking at a new Porsche Boxter, and the salesman tells him that driving the Porsche should improve?

porsche dealer


his love life. Based on this and the fact that Donald thinks the Porsche is really nifty and swell, he buys the car. Donald sues the dealer because his love life has not improved. Which is true?

Donald cannot win on the basis of fraud because not all the elements of fraud are met.
Donald can win on the basis of unilateral mistake because he was the only one who really thought his love life would improve.
Donald can win on the basis of a mutual mistake of fact because both parties were wrong about thinking his love life would improve.
This contract is void as against public policy because someone named Donald should not be driving a Porsche.







12 Responses to 'Donald is looking at a new Porsche Boxter, and the salesman tells him that driving the Porsche should improve?'

  1. Jay L - March 27th, 2007 at 11:37 pm

    Donald cannot win on the basis of fraud because not all the elements of fraud are met.

    If it ain’t in writing, it isn’t a part of the contract. Althogh I like this choice as well

    This contract is void as against public policy because someone named Donald should not be driving a Porsche.

  2. mega-moma - March 31st, 2007 at 1:25 am

    contracts law classes are boring arent they. i had a ben stein for a teacher and still amnaged an a..im sure youll be fine, read your books and you can get the info from them….good luck

  3. wizjp - April 2nd, 2007 at 8:15 pm

    1 & 4

    should is a legal weasel word.

  4. sgoldperson - April 4th, 2007 at 3:23 am

    He can’t not win on the basis of fraud because not all the elements of fraud are met.
    Technically NONE are. The salesman said it SHOULD, not WOULD. Donald needs to listen closer, or learn the meaning of words. Should doesn’t mean it will, it means it PROBABLY will. That would be a big detail in Court, and then you add that it is the salesman saying it and has nothing to do with the terms of sale. I mean even if they put it in the contract/sales agreement then it still wouldn’t meet it.

    Seriously is this homework or something, just seems strange about the questions you are asking be multiple choice liek this.

  5. gezginler indir - October 11th, 2010 at 7:43 pm

    The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

  6. Shira Thivener - October 12th, 2010 at 2:29 am

    I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  7. how to do - October 15th, 2010 at 3:13 am

    Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

  8. learn how to tie a tie - October 18th, 2010 at 11:36 pm

    Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  9. how to get a job as a directional driller in the oilfield - October 20th, 2010 at 12:27 am

    If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.

  10. how to write a resume - October 20th, 2010 at 2:36 am

    Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.

  11. Laurence Routh - October 21st, 2010 at 5:24 am

    The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  12. film izle - November 5th, 2010 at 4:32 am

    I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)


Leave a Reply