LovePorsche.com




Rear engine car ie a porsche, how do they make it handle well?

porsche


I ask because i have a model car with two pairs of springs hard and soft, should i put the hard ones at the front or the rear?

My car has a center of gravity near the rear just like a porsche.







12 Responses to 'Rear engine car ie a porsche, how do they make it handle well?'

  1. nick_oldno7 - August 3rd, 2007 at 2:49 am

    if most of the weight is towards the rear put the harder springs there, the softer ones will bottom out.

  2. Philip P - August 3rd, 2007 at 3:10 am

    porsches are tail swingers by nature all that weight behind the axle acts like a pendulum. also all that unsprung weight behind the axle..
    Put your stronger springs in the rear…

  3. Paul S - August 3rd, 2007 at 9:59 am

    Porsche accomplishes the handling capabilities in a number of ways… though ultimately, a car with such a weight distrubition will leave alot to the skill of the driver. The balance is not ideal for many applications, but conversely it allows for it to do somethings that would not be practical to do in other cars.

    As to your dilemna with the springs… you say you have a hard set and soft set. Where each should go will depend alot on the just how soft is soft, and hard is hard.

    As has been pointed out, the heavier rear will require more spring than the lighter front… and as a generalization, the harder will always be in the back under such circumstances.

    However, since this question started off about how to make a rear engined car handle… it will get down to the types of spings and actual rates. While a 911 will have heavier springs to the rear, they may well be proportionally softer than the front in order to help the rear grip more (a harder rear and softer front could well become too “oversteery”).

  4. gezginler indir - October 10th, 2010 at 7:02 pm

    I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  5. indir - October 10th, 2010 at 10:02 pm

    The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  6. Connie Dimare - October 12th, 2010 at 2:31 am

    This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.

  7. learn how to - October 15th, 2010 at 3:14 am

    Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

  8. learn how to tie a tie - October 18th, 2010 at 11:37 pm

    If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.

  9. how to how to lose weight fast - October 20th, 2010 at 12:28 am

    i didnt know that, is there another article like that? because i really wanna know more about it

  10. how to write a resume - October 20th, 2010 at 2:26 am

    This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.

  11. Ester Karabin - October 21st, 2010 at 4:55 am

    Sorry for the huge review, but I’m really loving the new Zune, and hope this, as well as the excellent reviews some other people have written, will help you decide if it’s the right choice for you.

  12. indirmeden film izle - November 5th, 2010 at 10:31 am

    Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.


Leave a Reply