LovePorsche.com




What was the original engine type put in Porsche 944s?

porsche


i know there’s all types of years but just for the average porsche 944,what’s the engine?…or Is there even an ‘avg’ porsche 944?
Lamens terms if you guys don’t mind please! lol flywheel,transaxle,driveshaft,liters?? please understand you’re talking to a complete amateur and beginner rookie to this mess.Thanks much!







11 Responses to 'What was the original engine type put in Porsche 944s?'

  1. Jason - August 15th, 2007 at 10:37 am

    2.5 L I4
    2.7 L I4
    3.0 L I4

  2. jbpopem - August 16th, 2007 at 2:11 pm

    2.5 litre inline slant 4. The clutch is on the flywheel, the transaxle is in the back meaning the driveshaft takes engine torque all the time. Some came turbo. Niice…

  3. jbalthas - August 21st, 2007 at 4:31 am

    It was a small engine. The car was produced in the ’80s when engines were typically 4, 6, or 8 cylinders. (A V8 would be an 8 cylinder engine, for example). The 944 came with a 4 cylinder engine. Among 4 cylinder engines of that era, it was on the larger side (that’s the 2.5 or 2.7 liter thing), with pretty high horsepower (again, relative to 4 cylinder engines of the time) at about 140 hp.
    Most 944s came with this type of engine, but some came with a turbo-charged engine which added about 80 extra hp.
    Sometimes, the 944 Turbo is called a “951″ (Porsche’s internal model designation), or “944 Turbo”, but usually not just “944″.
    The later 944 with the bigger 2.7 liter engines had some other nice technology too, giving them up to about 180 hp.

  4. Cash - August 24th, 2007 at 7:31 am

    2.5 litre inline slant 4.

  5. indir - October 10th, 2010 at 10:02 pm

    This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.

  6. Fransisca Crossland - October 12th, 2010 at 2:32 am

    This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.

  7. ehowto - October 15th, 2010 at 6:47 am

    Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

  8. learn how to tie a tie - October 18th, 2010 at 11:37 pm

    If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.

  9. how to make money from home - October 20th, 2010 at 12:28 am

    This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.

  10. Williemae Tanous - October 21st, 2010 at 9:44 am

    I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  11. film izle - November 5th, 2010 at 9:55 am

    The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.


Leave a Reply