I have a 1985 944 that is just breaking all the time and I was wondering if anyone had any ideas of any cars that are kind of the same, but not as expensive to maintain and don’t break as often. I was thinking an Audi Ur-Quattro but they seem like they’ll be just as expensive too.
Thanks for all of your time
(I work on it a lot, it’s just that parts are a bitch and everything keeps breaking. There’s always something to fix)
Best Deal Ads :
i think audi is going to be very similar in mainanence costs and repair amounts. I would recommend something like a toyota celica.
maybe u can buy a lancia delta, or a 911. looks better and faster, but more expensive too.
SUPRA SUPRA SUPRA SUPRA SUPRA SUPRA SUPRA
If you want a fast car you will have to pay to maintain that expensive car. you should look into learning how to work on your car. Audi’s are expensive to maintain, also.
If you can find a well cared for 3rd generation Honda Prelude, you’ll be surprised how similar a FWD car can be too the Porsche in steering feel and driving position.
I’m partial to the Cayman.
Acura Integra
RSX
Sorry for the huge review, but I’m really loving the new Zune, and hope this, as well as the excellent reviews some other people have written, will help you decide if it’s the right choice for you.
The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.
Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.
The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.
Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.
I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)
Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.
Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.