LovePorsche.com




lamborghni gallardo, ferrari modena, twin-turbo porsche carrera, viper srt/10 or gts. which one should i get?

porsche carrera


or should i say my friend. he has about 120k saved up (which only took him 6 months since hes a rich bastard) and hes stuck on what he wants. i said a viper, b/c theyre not too expmensive (like an 04 is only 60k) and they beat a lamborghini, ferrari, and maybe a tt carrera. and they look hella sick :)







10 Responses to 'lamborghni gallardo, ferrari modena, twin-turbo porsche carrera, viper srt/10 or gts. which one should i get?'

  1. Gary K - November 28th, 2007 at 9:11 pm

    Forget all of them. Get a ZO6 Corvette It’s cheaper and faster.

  2. smokey - November 30th, 2007 at 9:52 am

    let the man with the money decide

  3. devil - December 1st, 2007 at 10:56 am

    You should choose a ferrari or a porsche.Choose the one which is good looking.

  4. Hakem - December 4th, 2007 at 10:24 pm

    get a Corvette Z06. Faster and Cheaper.

  5. indir - October 10th, 2010 at 10:07 pm

    The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

  6. Ellsworth Christiana - October 12th, 2010 at 2:34 am

    I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  7. how to - October 15th, 2010 at 3:15 am

    Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  8. how to tie a tie - October 18th, 2010 at 11:38 pm

    Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

  9. how to write a resume - October 20th, 2010 at 2:59 am

    The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  10. Porsha Ngyun - October 21st, 2010 at 5:43 am

    The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.


Leave a Reply