LovePorsche.com




Is the Porsche 356 the baddest car there is?

porsche


My dad says so maybe its because he is restoring one.







16 Responses to 'Is the Porsche 356 the baddest car there is?'

  1. stupidae86man - May 31st, 2008 at 6:13 am

    Bad as in horrible? not really, could be worse.
    Bad as in cool? depends.

    But this is a reskinned VW Beetle with a modified engine.

  2. charlie at the lake - June 1st, 2008 at 10:30 am

    the baddest

  3. BrewMan - June 4th, 2008 at 8:57 pm

    Mmmmm??? That’s a tough question. What about the Corvette Z06? The ’69 Camaro? The Shelby Series One? The McLaren F1? See what I mean?

    It’s all a matter of taste. Style. Elegance. Muscle. Speed. Price. Rarity. I think the Porsche 356 is an awesome car. The baddest? Probably not.

  4. eldoradodave - June 5th, 2008 at 2:11 am

    Roger ,if your Dad says it then it must be true in his heart. So by you helping him then you too can say it.

  5. texasjewboy12 - June 6th, 2008 at 1:52 am

    It’s all subjective. If you mean “good looking”, that’s especially subjective. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, you know? If you mean “fast”, that’s subjective too, but a Porsche is essentially a mid-engine VW, so there are lots of faster cars out there. As a car nut from way back, I say, just pick one you like and stick with it. I’ll bet that’s what your old man is doing.

  6. Spinner...428 - June 8th, 2008 at 5:56 pm

    In the VW MG world YES it is…

    Over all NO…. F1, 959, 928 S4
    ask him about a 931 Turbo or 932 Turbo Those are some odd balls.

    ,,,,

  7. edselmanll - June 9th, 2008 at 12:36 am

    No, not BAD, JUST COOL, its a 50 year old sports car and getting pretty valuable :)

    Most of the late 50′s American cars would outrun it

  8. serene792p - June 11th, 2008 at 8:50 am

    um….NO that would be the 962

  9. Richo Fev - June 14th, 2008 at 2:23 pm

    I would say the 69 Mustang is the baddest car ever built.

  10. program indir - October 10th, 2010 at 10:17 pm

    Sorry for the huge review, but I’m really loving the new Zune, and hope this, as well as the excellent reviews some other people have written, will help you decide if it’s the right choice for you.

  11. ehowto - October 15th, 2010 at 6:49 am

    Sorry for the huge review, but I’m really loving the new Zune, and hope this, as well as the excellent reviews some other people have written, will help you decide if it’s the right choice for you.

  12. how to tie a tie - October 18th, 2010 at 11:41 pm

    Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.

  13. how to how to get pregnant - October 20th, 2010 at 12:31 am

    The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  14. how to write a resume - October 20th, 2010 at 2:44 am

    Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

  15. Laurence Doore - October 21st, 2010 at 5:18 am

    Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  16. sinema izle - November 5th, 2010 at 5:27 am

    I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)


Leave a Reply