LovePorsche.com




How reliable are Porsche’s compared to more exotic cars and also compared to ordinary cars?

porsche


Mechanically over time i’m talking about. Can porsche be used as a daily driver?







13 Responses to 'How reliable are Porsche’s compared to more exotic cars and also compared to ordinary cars?'

  1. Cody M - July 31st, 2008 at 1:48 pm

    I don;t know to much, but i do know compared to other exotic cars they are very reliable. I have always considered a Porsche to be an every day driver They are fantastic card, and are very mechanically sound. Just make sure to maintain it regularly.

  2. Mike The Stockbroker - August 4th, 2008 at 12:53 am

    I owned quite a few of these, Gt3. Infact when my boss sold me his 360 CS I traded mine in for a porche beacuse Ferrari was killing me with ever 3k i had to change breaks and ect.

    porsche is GREAT compared to any car in the world reliable and amazing. Porche is great if u dont want to get noticed and you want a fast car.

    My ferrari was nice, but i was more scared to leave it parked where i worked.

    you cant go wrong with porche.

  3. CT - August 7th, 2008 at 6:47 am

    They can be used as a daily driver. However they still aren’t the most reliable cars in the world. My Uncle is a doctor so his spoiled kids got used Porsches as first cars and those cars drained their wallets and to this day one of my cousins likes my Nissan better than his Porsche.

  4. Supremacy - August 9th, 2008 at 5:50 am

    porsche is MUCH less likely to get stolen and much cheaper to own and repair compared to cars like Ferrari, Lambo or Bentley.

    it’s fuel economy is 15/22, which is better than any of those other 4.

    But 911/Carrera gets less “OMFG HOT RIDE!” than any of those other cars…

  5. C7S - August 10th, 2008 at 11:32 pm

    Yes, they can be and are used as daily drivers.

    They are the most reliable German brand. Better than BMW, Mercedes, VW, Audi.

    As far as I know and heard, they are much more reliable, more practical, and more fuel efficient than Ferrari’s, Lamborghini’s, Aston Martins, Jaguar’s, Spykers, and others.

    They are not as good as Honda, Acura, Toyota, Lexus, Scion, Nissan, Infiniti, and Mazda. But they are pretty much better than the other companies.

  6. Tee - August 12th, 2008 at 3:05 pm

    I have driven over 300,000 miles over a series of three 911′s with only one failure that caused me 10 minutes of grief. It was on my first Porsche (’72 911) and the battery cable to to the fusebox came loose and the car quit at a stop light. figured it out in a couple of minutes and was off and running. Every other item that I have worked on was a maintenance item.

  7. tam indir - October 10th, 2010 at 10:20 pm

    The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  8. gezginler indir - October 11th, 2010 at 7:51 pm

    The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

  9. how to do - October 15th, 2010 at 5:57 am

    Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  10. how to how to look up a business by their tax id number - October 20th, 2010 at 12:32 am

    Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  11. how to write a resume - October 20th, 2010 at 3:13 am

    If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.

  12. Iesha Costenive - October 21st, 2010 at 5:31 am

    The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

  13. film izle - November 5th, 2010 at 10:02 am

    The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.


Leave a Reply