Which should I get? The Porsche is beautiful, powerful, elegant, and fuel efficient, but the Aston Martin is powerful, more rare, same speed (for the most part). So which one? Heres the Porsche
And the Aston Martin
http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg99/pere_n/IMG_6681.jpg
Best Deal Ads :
The Aston Martin has more of ‘Wow!’ factor. Porsches are seen everyday, just about everywhere. How often, though, do you see an Aston Martin?
aston will have a higher resale value in years to come, if that’s a factor for you. the Porsche will not. and of course the AM just looks better. IMO
For pure efficiency I would choose the 911 but the Aston Martin for class and long term ownership. The 911 would be better for daily use.
id consider getting the porsche cause the gas prices today are like 4 dollars a gallon!
the aston martin but not that stupid convertible 1 get the hardtop
Porsche.
Faster around the track, more practical, more reliable, better on gas.
Ferrari 550 maranello
911 Carerra S. That is when you can afford it. You post some asinine questions, and it is obvious you are a kid. The screen name is a giveaway.
Personally, I prefer the Porsche because it gets more respect. With the Aston, expect people denting, dinging, scratching, spitting, and keying the car. People don’t like other people treating themselves to something nice.
I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)
Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.
Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.
If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.
The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.
i didnt know that, is there another article like that? because i really wanna know more about it