LovePorsche.com




The Nissan GT-R just beat the Porsche Turbo and BMW M3, how will this affect BMW and Porsche sales?

porsche gt


Here are the videos:

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/d…

For half the money of a Porsche turbo, same price as the BMW M3, the GT-R is faster on track than a Bugatti Veyron and Porsche Turbo and GT3, probably GT2 too, with an acceleration time from 0-60 of 3.2 seconds (Faster than a Ferrari Enzo). How will this affect the competition if there is any?
Sorry, the link above is broken, go to this link:

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Features/articleId=124973







14 Responses to 'The Nissan GT-R just beat the Porsche Turbo and BMW M3, how will this affect BMW and Porsche sales?'

  1. Marla S - April 12th, 2009 at 6:57 am

    true competion begins!

  2. l0v3!y - April 13th, 2009 at 12:02 pm

    i dont think it should i mean
    my parents stopped buying nissans period.
    thatt company hass cheap carss let me rephrase that i meann the maxima we once owned left my papa stuck in a parking lot becuase it wouldnt start when it was four months old
    then before that we heard NIssan x terras were doing flips off the free way so we sold that too
    butt even iff a carr can accelarate fast enough it doesnt always mean the owners are actually going to speed up that fast and quickly just to stop at the next stop signn
    soo i dont think this will afect the competition at all

  3. John Paul - April 13th, 2009 at 4:23 pm

    So how many of the 1,400 GTR’s do you want? Limited production will keep these cars from affecting the Porsche and BMW who crank out 100,000 Carrera’s and M-3′s.

  4. tricky - April 15th, 2009 at 11:54 am

    I dont think it will effect the other companies ,the GTR has always been a challenge for the Porsche and the M3 in its try running power and this has never bothered them before.
    Also owning a M3 and Porsche is more of a status symbol whilst the GTR has a different image and will appeal to different buyers .
    Myself i would pick the GTR over any of the others.

    As for the answer above about a bad Maxima etc a shame we had one and it was one of the best cars we ever had.Where on our 5th Nissan atm and i def want another one. next.

  5. LE - April 16th, 2009 at 11:33 pm

    Not at all. Most guys aren’t buying these BMW or Porsche for speed. Its usually status or compensating for something else.

    Women are attracted to money, and Nissan just doesn’t say “money” like a Porsche or BMW.

  6. C7S - April 18th, 2009 at 2:26 am

    Edmunds says the 0-60 time is 3.5 seconds.

    Anyways, I don’t think it will affect the sales of Porsche or BMW.
    Porsche’s can run at high speeds for long amounts of time. They always win the endurance races. I think the Nissan would not be able to take it.

    BMW M3 does not compete with the GT-R. It competes with the Audi RS4, Lexus IS-F, and Mercedes C63 AMG.

  7. gcodewhodi - April 18th, 2009 at 11:54 pm

    it would cause no effect cause there still great cars

  8. Matt G - April 21st, 2009 at 9:12 am

    It is definitely an incredible car. I think that that Nissan’s move to keep the GT-R as a Nissan is a statement that they are strictly enthusiasts and that they are concerned with the tradition of the old GT-R’s image as an incredible performer. This means that they would rather have their cars owned by car enthusiasts rather than 55 year old men at a country club. This will affect competition but not much sales. And actually C7S, Edmunds says 3.3 seconds to be exact…or have you not watched the test video?

  9. program indir - October 10th, 2010 at 11:12 pm

    Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  10. gezginler indir - October 11th, 2010 at 10:30 pm

    I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  11. how to choose blog designs - October 20th, 2010 at 12:35 am

    If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.

  12. how to write a resume - October 20th, 2010 at 3:16 am

    Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  13. Orval Whittinghill - October 21st, 2010 at 4:41 am

    Sorry for the huge review, but I’m really loving the new Zune, and hope this, as well as the excellent reviews some other people have written, will help you decide if it’s the right choice for you.

  14. online film izle - November 5th, 2010 at 5:20 am

    Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.


Leave a Reply