Is it a special edition? Because I’ve searched the internet high and low and I can’t find another red 944 any year, with tan leather interior. Was the car re-painted? Any and all information would be lovely, I’m purchasing my new 944 this weekend. Well not technically new, but hey.
Best Deal Ads :
There were no special editions of the 944 in 1983 (which was the first model year for the 944). Guards Red was a standard color, and in many Porsche models is often paired with a tan leather interior (which was also a standard color option). From my personal experience, I think this could be the most common color combo for 944 models (and if not the most, certainly up in the top three).
And it is possible the car was repainted – any Porsche mechanic that performed a pre-purchase inspection should be able to tell you if that is the case, though if you want to double check yourself you can compare the paint code with the actual color (the original Glasurit code should be on a label under the hood, along with the car’s option codes and similar info)… check for signs of overspray or mismatching color under the hood. Another excellent check point is the paint inside the fenders – it should both match and have a rough textured finish (if this was ever stripped to be refinished, it is usually found to be smooth).
Porsche didn’t make special editions for 944s in 1983. As it has the same interior of a Porsche 924 (which you could get tan interiors), I would say it was on the options list and yeah, that’s what happened. One way of telling if the car has been repainted a different color is to look inside the engine compartment and see if the tops of the wheel wells are a different color. My 924 is a nice bright red, but originally it was a champagne color (ugh.)
Who cares…get a 911 C4S.
Some do and some do not.
I think most of them had tan leather interior.
Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.
The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.
The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.
If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.
Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.
i didnt know that, is there another article like that? because i really wanna know more about it
Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.