LovePorsche.com




Is it true that the VW Beetle is just a mislabled Porsche?

porsche


The speed, braking,. steering & performance around curves are top notch, but more importantly identical.







14 Responses to 'Is it true that the VW Beetle is just a mislabled Porsche?'

  1. dodge man - June 5th, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    no this is some peoples way of describing the new beetle ,but it was not built on the principal of the Porsche,it was a separate design,,it does have some of the features but they were added to enhance the beetle,,but a lot of vehicle s have similar things in common,,good luck i hope this help,s

  2. aarcue - June 8th, 2009 at 5:31 pm

    The ‘new’ Beetle is nothing more than a re-bodied Golf.

    The original Beetle was designed by Dr Ferdinand Porsche. The similarity between the original Beetle and the first Porsches is very clear to see.

    Check out the 356 and you will see.

  3. jen w - June 11th, 2009 at 12:20 am

    mislabeled not! Just the most popular car ever sold Porsche designed it by order of Hitler,,a car for the people reliable,practical,affordable

  4. Moose - June 13th, 2009 at 9:37 am

    It’s like asking if Chimpanzees are human. Same lineage. 99% identical genetic makeup, but distant cousins at best… Both companies were started by the same man. You can exchange early porche engines for Volkswagen engines on both cars. Porche runs a little better, but VW was designed to be more economical and practical.

  5. mancman - June 14th, 2009 at 3:22 am

    ..YES…same as a GT3….same spec…different price !

  6. Patrick M - June 16th, 2009 at 10:27 am

    The above link is for a book called the Volkswagen Chronicle, which is a very interesting read (plus cheap as well) if your want to learn more about the VW/Porsche connection. While most people know about the early connections, it covers projects they where working on together into the 70′s. For example look at the 914, it even sold badged with the name “VW-Porsche” in Europe. So, while they are two different companies, they are both closely connected and shared many designs. Are they the same? No, but they are two closely related companies that have benefited hugely from each others designs/ideas.

  7. mcraaj - June 16th, 2009 at 1:03 pm

    the vw beetle is like the little fat kid who says one day i will grow up to be just like him…..and years later he is still little fat kid..

  8. gezginler indir - October 10th, 2010 at 11:16 pm

    The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  9. tam indir - October 11th, 2010 at 7:59 pm

    I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  10. ehow - October 15th, 2010 at 6:00 am

    i didnt know that, is there another article like that? because i really wanna know more about it

  11. how to how to look up a business by their tax id number - October 20th, 2010 at 12:36 am

    Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.

  12. how to write a resume - October 20th, 2010 at 3:13 am

    Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  13. Bettie Conole - October 21st, 2010 at 5:02 am

    If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.

  14. sinema izle - November 5th, 2010 at 4:35 am

    Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.


Leave a Reply