LovePorsche.com




What grade of gas should I use on 2005 Porsche Cayenne S?

porsche


I was looking to buy a Porsche Cayenne S 2005 and I was wondering what grade of gasoline should I or have to use for it. Can I go using one type of gas for a while then switch? It has 57500 miles on it if you needed to know. I would really appreciate some answers to this, thanks.

High quality cold air intakes will Increase Power & Improve Mileage. Lowest Prices Guaranteed!






13 Responses to 'What grade of gas should I use on 2005 Porsche Cayenne S?'

  1. redsox - October 31st, 2009 at 9:40 pm

    nothing lower than 91 octane… high performance cars need it… low octane would cause pinging and weaken the performance

  2. Uncle Bo - November 2nd, 2009 at 1:44 am

    Use whatever Porsche specifies for the engine. I am sure it is premium unleaded. Pretty much everything Porsche is high performance and their engines will need premium fuel for best performance.

    From a Car And Driver long term test of the 05 Cayenne:

    “Fuel economy was a concern for a vehicle this large. We averaged 16 mpg, splitting the EPA 14 city and 18 highway ratings. And the premium-fuel requirement pushed at least one fill-up to $100″

    There ya go.

  3. Chris - November 3rd, 2009 at 11:07 pm

    definitely nothing lower than 91. Especially since it’s the S.

  4. Kyle M - November 5th, 2009 at 3:53 am

    Whatever the specs say. Usually it says on the inside of the fuel filler door.

    Using lower grade gas than recommended can run into knock issues and too high of grade is a waste of money.

  5. designergenes - November 6th, 2009 at 10:22 am

    Yes, the minimum grade will be listed on the inside of the filler door. However, my 911 says “Min 93 Octane;” something not available here in the western U.S. Check your owner’s manual. Mine says automatic compensation is built into the car for slightly lower grades.

    In Salt Lake City, the best Premium gas is only 91 Octane. My car runs fine on it. Don’t put anything less than the best available into your Porsche.

  6. DR DEAL - November 8th, 2009 at 2:16 am

    Read all the others and simply put, nothing under the highest Ron 91-93 the top $$ range for best performance and MPG.

  7. indir - October 10th, 2010 at 11:32 pm

    Sorry for the huge review, but I’m really loving the new Zune, and hope this, as well as the excellent reviews some other people have written, will help you decide if it’s the right choice for you.

  8. gezginler indir - October 11th, 2010 at 10:34 pm

    Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.

  9. learn how to - October 15th, 2010 at 8:45 am

    Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

  10. how to tie a tie - October 18th, 2010 at 11:51 pm

    I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  11. how to wordpress how to - October 20th, 2010 at 12:39 am

    Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  12. Blanca Bretana - October 21st, 2010 at 5:37 am

    I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  13. indirmeden film izle - November 5th, 2010 at 10:03 am

    Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.


Leave a Reply